Why the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Health Women’s Clinic matters for architects and architecture students

Fellow students, collaborators, and colleagues: We dissent.

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court released the opinions for Dobbs v. Jackson Health Women’s Clinic, overturning two landmark cases: Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). We join Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor in opposition of the ruling, and use the term “We dissent” to uphold the federal right to abortion care.

We are future architects, designers, educators, writers, scholars, and practitioners of all scales. We are citizens and non-citizens of these United States. We are women, men, and non-binary people. We, Princeton Womxn in Design and Architecture (WDA), dissent.

(Courtesy WDA)

→ Continue reading at The Architect's Newspaper

[ufc-fb-comments url="http://www.newyorkmetropolitan.com/design/why-the-supreme-courts-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-health-womens-clinic-matters-for-architects-and-architecture-students"]

Latest Articles

Related Articles